Legal Opinion

Kaparic v. 309 E. 5 St. LLC

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 25, 2016No. 2016 NYSlipOp 50814(U)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mary Kaparic, Plaintiff-Respondent,

against

309 East 5 Street LLC, Fame Partners, LLC and R.A. Cohen & Associates, Defendants-Appellants.

Defendants appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Paul A. Goetz, J.), entered August 12, 2015, which denied their motion to preclude, or in the alternative, to compel compliance with certain discovery demands.

2Per curiam

Order (Paul A. Goetz, J.), entered August 12, 2015, reversed, without costs, and defendants' motion is granted to the extent of precluding plaintiff from offering evidence of her injuries unless she fully…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lipson v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSBAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. M & J Trimming, Inc. v. Kew Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Cela v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Pirone v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API