Legal Opinion

Barnes v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 12, 1993No. A9106-03921; CA A72532PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

In this unlawful employment practice action, plaintiff appeals a summary judgment for defendant. We affirm.

In 1988, plaintiff suffered a compensable injury while working for defendant. She filed a workers’ compensation claim, which defendant accepted. She became medically stationary on September 20, 1989. On that same day, she accepted employment with a different employer. On June 28, 1990, plaintiffs attorney wrote a letter to defendant, stating that plaintiff was capable of returning to her former employment with defendant and requesting that she be reinstated to her former position or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Joseph v. LoweryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Holmes v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edward D. Jones & Co. v. MishlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Franzen v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Armstrong v. Rogue Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Astleford v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Armstrong v. Rogue Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API