Legal Opinion
Christenson v. St. Mary's Hosp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 29, 1993No. Civ. 4-93-132PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the separate motions of defendants St. Mary’s Hospital and Ruhof Corporation for summary judgment. 1 Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, the court grants both defendants their motions for summary judgment as to the existence of a private cause of action under the statutes pled by plaintiffs and dismisses the complaint without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
Defendant Ruhof Corporation (“Ruhof’) manufactures and distributes various hospital supplies, including Liquijet, the product at the center…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Palmer v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Buckley v. Control Data Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wallace v. Parks Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Pennsylvania General Insurance v. LandisDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Canty v. Ever-Last Supply Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Isgett by and Through Isgett v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1997
- Robinson v. ROOTO CORP.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.