Legal Opinion

Brown v. McCord & Bradfield Furniture Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to superior court of Grand Rapids. (Parrish, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

This case is an action of assumpsit brought in the superior court of Grand Rapids, to recover for the value of two boat-loads of lumber, which the plaintiff claims to have sold in 1882 to the defendant. The plaintiff obtained judgment for $54=2, and defendant brings error.

The plaintiff on the trial claimed that he in person sold to the defendant’s lawful agent for purchasing the lumber in question, and that he caused the same to be delivered to the defendant. On the contrary, the defendant’s theory was that it purchased the lumber at Grand Rapids of Buchanan & Mizner, and of whom its agent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lake Superior Iron Co. v. EricksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Hanchett v. McQueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mahiat v. CoddeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Fitzcharles v. MayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. LevySupreme Court of Florida · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API