Conservation Council of North Carolina v. Haste
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
The issue before us is whether appellants are entitled to a contested case hearing under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) to contest the Department of Transportation’s decisions as to what measures are appropriate to protect the southern end of the Herbert C. Bonner Bridge from erosion. We hold that appellants are entitled to a contested case hearing.
Petition for Contested Case Hearing
Petitioners requested a contested case hearing under G.S. 113A-121.1(b) which provides:
A determination of the appropriateness of a contested case ... shall be based on whether the person…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Leiphart v. North Carolina School of the ArtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF CORRECTION v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985