State v. McCoy
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
This case involves the question of whether the state can enforce reasonably necessary regulations for the conservation of chinook salmon fisheries against an Indian whose tribe was a party to the Treaty of Point Elliott, 12 Stat. 927 (January 22, 1855).
Defendant, an American Indian of Swinomish descent, was charged with fishing in closed waters. The trial court acquitted him, holding that the Treaty of Point Elliott granted him immunity from state regulatory powers. The state appeals.
In the early morning hours of July 28, 1960, defendant was fishing from his boat in what is called the “jetty…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- United States v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. GurnoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. TinnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.