Legal Opinion

Barnsdall Refining Corporation v. Birnamwood Oil Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 29, 1940No. 4920PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action for payment of an account for merchandise sold and delivered by it to the defendant, said merchandise consisting of petroleum products.

The defendant has interposed its sixth amended answer, set-off, and counter claim.

Plaintiff moves to dismiss the second cause of action in the counter claim for the reason that same is not pleadable as a counter claim, and that therefore the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the plaintiff in relation thereto. In the alternative the plaintiff moves to dismiss the second cause of action in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Bell v. LambornCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gutor International Ag v. Raymond Packer Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  2. United States Ex Rel. Greenville Equipment Co. v. United States Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
  3. Brown Paper Mill Co. v. Agar Mfg. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  4. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BassSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  5. Noma Electric Corp. v. Polaroid Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API