Legal Opinion
Smith v. Miami-Dade County
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided January 17, 2014No. Case No. 13-CV-21986-UUPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
UNGARO, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to „ Dismiss. D.E. 37.
THE COURT has considered the motion and the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The motion has been fully briefed, and is ripe for determination.
BACKGROUND
The pertinent facts, interpreted in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, are as follows. Plaintiff began working for Defendant as a bus operator in 2Q05. First Amended Complaint ¶ 16. Due to work-related injuries sustained on January 22, 2007, Plaintiff became unable to work for a period…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Raytheon Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Edwards v. Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Stewart v. Happy Herman's Cheshire Bridge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.