Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Blackman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from, Shawnee District Court. Action brought by Blackman and another against Crawford and others, to recover for stone and sand used in the construction of Crawford’s opera house, and to foreclose a mechanics’ lien thereon. June 15, 1882, judgment for the plaintiffs for $290.25, and interest, and for the foreclosure of the lien. Defendants L. M. Crawford and Mary E. Crawford bring this judgment here for review. Other facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This was an action brought by Blackman ■& Johnson against Crawford and others, to recover for stone and sand used in the construction of the Crawford opera house, and also to foreclose a mechanics’ lien. One Lagerstrom was the contractor with Crawford the owner, for the stone work of the building. Lagerstrom sub-let to Blackman ■& Johnson the furnishing of the sand and stone under his contract.

The point presented in the brief of the plaintiffs in error, is that the court erred in instructing the jury —

“That for the purposes of this case,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Livermore v. WrighSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  2. Clough v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Perry v. ConroySupreme Court of Kansas · 1879

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fossett v. Rock Island Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. National Surety Co. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Hoggson Bros. v. Dickason-Goodman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Catlin v. DouglassUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
  5. Seaton v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API