Barton v. Campbell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNs, J.
Two questions are presented for decision: (1) Does item First of the will place a limitation upon the title to personal property bequeathed to the plaintiff? (2) If so, is the limitation satisfied and removed by the adoption of Sylvia and Samuel Barton?
In finding the answer to question (1), we must recognize that the intention of the testatrix is her will. Woodard v. Clark, 234 N.C. 215, 66 S.E. 2d 888. The intent must be carried out unless some rule of law forbids it. Hummell v. Hummell, 241 N.C. 254, 85 S.E. 2d 144; Trust Co. v. Green, 238 N.C. 339, 78 S.E. 2d 174.
When the testatrix said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woodard v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Smyth v. . McKissickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Bradford v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Grimes v. . GrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Hummell v. HummellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Poindexter v. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Cutrer v. CutrerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Entwistle v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Wachovia Bank and Trust Company v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Bullock v. BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.