Legal Opinion

Hummell v. Hummell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1954No. 238PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The sole question for decision here is whether the gift to the four named children or survivors carried the entire estate to the three children of the testatrix who survived her, or whether the children of Leslie Ray Hummell, who predeceased the executrix, took the share intended for him. It is patent the will was intended to dispose of the maker’s estate. Those who take under the will, take as purchasers. By the use of the words “or survivors” the intention is clear the survivors shall be determined as of the date of the maker’s death. This must be so for the reason that no preceding estate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. . KearneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  2. Mercer v. . DownsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Ham v. . HamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Wooten v. . HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Threadgill v. . IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Polen v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wachovia Bank and Trust Company v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Mitchell v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Early v. BowenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Barton v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API