Legal Opinion

Purzel Video GmbH v. Smoak

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided January 6, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-cv-001167-WYD-MEHPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Defendant Smoak’s Counterclaims and to Strike Defendant Smoak’s Affirmative Defenses (ECF No. 50). In his Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Hegarty recommends that the pending motion be granted. (Recommendation at 1). The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.CivJP. 72(b).

Magistrate Judge Hegarty advised the parties that written objections were due…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Gary J. Griggs and Susan GoddardColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. McDaniel v. Navient Solutions, LLC (In re McDaniel)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2018
  3. Energy Intelligence Grp., Inc. v. CHS Mcpherson Refinery, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  4. Lints v. Graco Fluid Handling (A) Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2018
  5. (PC) Lugo v. FisherDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API