Legal Opinion
United States v. Freitas
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 14, 1985No. CR-85-0025 EFLPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPRESSION ORDER
LYNCH, District Judge.
The defendants in this case are charged with manufacturing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. section 841(a)(1), and with conspiracy to commit the above offense in violation of 21 U.S.C. section 846. The instant matter involves a motion to suppress evidence filed by defendant Raymond Freitas and joined in by co-defendants Walter Freitas and Jonny McClellan. The Government opposes the motion and also objects to the joinder of Walter Freitas and McClellan on the ground that those defendants lack standing. This opinion addresses the legality of the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. George Vernon Johns, Albert William HaberkornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Willie B. Maggitt, A/K/A Willie B. MadgettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. George Vernon Johns and Albert William HaberkornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Raymond M. Freitas, Walter Freitas, and Jonny E. McClellan DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Raymond M. Freitas Walter Freitas Jonny McClellanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.