Legal Opinion
United States v. George Vernon Johns, Albert William Haberkorn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 15, 1988No. 87-1031, 87-1069PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The memorandum disposition filed May 23, 1988, is hereby redesignated a per cu-riam opinion as attached.
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellants George Johns and Albert Ha-berkorn appeal the district court’s refusal to grant a Franks hearing on the validity of a search warrant and its refusal to grant an evidentiary hearing under United States v. Freitas, 800 F.2d 1451 (9th Cir. 1986). Haberkorn also appeals the district court’s refusal to grant him standing to assert his rights to these hearings. We reverse on all three grounds and remand to the district court.
I
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
On January 13, 1985,…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. JohnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Stanley Mills StanertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Michael Lawrence PollockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Pace, Anthony Besase, Christ Savides, Donald Smith, John Cialoni, and Robert WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Sonnie Davis v. Kevin Davis, United States of America v. Kevin DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. David Taketa and Thomas O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. John C. MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.