Legal Opinion

Earl Parris, Jr., individually, and on behalf of a Class of persons similarly situated v. 3M Company, et al.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided March 24, 2026No. 4:21-cv-00040Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION EARL PARRIS, JR., individually, and on behalf of a Class of persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 4:21-CV-40-TWT 3M COMPANY, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This is an action under the Clean Water Act. It is before the Court on the Defendants 3M Company, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“EIDP”), and the Chemours Company’s (“Chemours”) (collectively, “the Manufacturing Defendants”) Joint Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Dr. Kristen Hansen [Doc. 886], EIDP and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Douglas C. Kilpatrick v. Breg, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Marianne Chapman v. The Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Eduardo Jaime RoucoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API