Oberndorfer v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice
■ This case in its general aspects is like that of Swift de Co., 59 C. Cls. 364, 270 U. S. 124. That is to say, the legal principles governing the cases are the same. The facts are not materially in dispute. A corporation known as L. Frank & Son Company was called upon to furnish large quantities of “ corned-beef hash ” during the months of January, February, and March, 1919, for Army uses. The officer in charge of the packing-house products branch, subsistence division, Quartermaster General’s office, being the director of purchase and storage, Brigadier General Kniskem on November 26,1918,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Meriwether v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Curran v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Pewabic Mining Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Winton v. AmosSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ekstrom v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937