People v. Arriola
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Defendant appeals from judgment of conviction of grand theft after jury trial. He admits the sufficiency of the evidence but contends the court erred (1) in giving instruction on unconsciousness; (2) in omitting “intent” from an instruction on intoxication.
Evidence
Shortly before noon Fred Clapp was sitting at the bar of the Big Horn Bar drinking a cup of coffee. He occasionally did banking for the proprietor and on this occasion the proprietor had just given him $175 in currency, a check and a bank book. Clapp had placed all three in the left breast pocket of a heavy outer shirt (mackinaw…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. McNicholCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. CorenevskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. SailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. DanaWashington Supreme Court · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.