Legal Opinion

Smith v. Southeastern Fidelity Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 2, 1986No. 72780PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Plaintiff sought no-fault benefits under an insurance policy issued by Southeastern, for the death of her husband. After discovery, Southeastern moved for summary judgment on the basis that Smith’s death was not the result of his operation, use or maintenance of a motor vehicle; that Southeastern paid plaintiff $5,000 basic PIP and Smith had declined “optional” PIP under OCGA § 33-34-5; that there was an endorsement to the policy excluding coverage under the instant circumstances; that prompt notice of the accident and proof of claim was not furnished by plaintiff as required…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. NeeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. American Casualty Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Standard Guaranty Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Mattox v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Showers v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Southeastern Fidelity InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Schroeder v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Schroeder v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API