Legal Opinion

D & H Auto Parts, Inc. v. Ford Marketing Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 7, 1971No. 71-C-1210Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JUDD, District Judge.

In an action for damages under the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13a, for alleged price discrimination, a non-party witness has moved by order to show cause to quash a subpoena duces tecum served on it by the defendant. The subpoena duces tecum was directed to Auto Parts of Jamaica, Inc. (APJ) *990(formerly Shapiro Auto Parts of Jamaica, Inc.) and asked for all records of purchases of spark plugs, filters and batteries from D & H Auto Parts, Inc. (D & H) during the period May 1, 1968 to January 1, 1970, as well as sales of products so purchased to third…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API