Legal Opinion
Brown v. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 2, 1948No. Civ. A. No. 2732PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
This is an action brought by the original plaintiff and 70 other employees of defendant to recover overtime wages alleged to 'be due under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. Defendant answered the amended complaint, which the court permitted plaintiffs to serve, and propounded six interrogatories. Plaintiffs objected to each of them on the ground that the information sought by the first two is entirely within defendant’s knowledge, that sought by No. 3 is fully known to defendant, that sought by the last three is in no way material to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cinema Amusements, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- Bowles v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1945
- Nichols v. Sanborn Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
- Fleming v. BernardiDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shell Co. (P. R.) Ltd. v. Tribunal de Distrito de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
- Brown v. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1948
- D & H Auto Parts, Inc. v. Ford Marketing Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- Shell Co. (P. R.) Ltd. v. District Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952