Legal Opinion

McConahey v. Griffey

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 22, 1891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

■Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. G. W. Wakefield, Judge. ( Action to recover damages íor a breach of promise of marriage. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHobinson, J.

The petition alleges that on or about the fifteenth day of April, 1887, the plaintiff 1. Matvriagb contract: validity: breach of promise: evidence. and defendant entered into an agreement, by virtue of which the defendant was to marry the plaintiff ; that at that time the defendant was in a delicate condition of health, and the performance of the agreement was made to depend upon his restoration to health, so that the *566marriage would- be expedient, and be could perform bis agreement; that the defendant recovered bis health, but ignored his agreement, and on the twenty-third of October, 1888,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Linden v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Blair Town Lot & Land Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  3. Royal v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  4. Thurston v. CavenorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morgan v. MuenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Lauer v. BanningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Rime v. RaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Beans v. DennySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Scott v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API