Legal Opinion

Chodos v. Flanzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1985PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated March 21, 1983, which, upon a jury verdict, found in favor of defendant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

After extensive expert testimony concerning the procedures used by defendant in treating plaintiff wife’s periodontal disease, the jury found that defendant was not negligent. “The weight to be afforded the conflicting testimony of experts is a matter peculiarly within the province of the jury” (Sternemann v Langs, 93 AD2d 819). On this record,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. O'Boyle v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Sternemann v. LangsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Palmeri v. SpiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Smith v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Norfleet v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Parmar v. SkinnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Stringile v. RothmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Furia v. MellucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API