Legal Opinion
Kroninger v. Anast
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1962No. Docket 8, Calendar 49,470PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The chancellor’s opinion is a model of comprehensive brevity. It states the essential facts fairly and presents all issues as follows:
“This is a suit by contract vendees for rescission on the ground that they are unable to use the real estate involved for the purpose and to the extent that it was represented they could use same by the defendant vendors. The defense is that the building involved has been used as a 7-family apartment down through the years, and that such use can be continued as a nonconforming use under the zoning code of the city of Pontiac. Said city was brought in as a party…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Candler v. HeighoMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Aldrich v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Rosenberg v. CyrowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- McIntyre v. LyonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Banque De Depots v. National Bank of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Irwin v. CarltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Gordon v. City of Warren Planning & Urban Renewal CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Callihan v. TalkowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.