Jimenez v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
This appeal is taken from a jury verdict for appellees in a personal injury, product liability action. PlaintiffiAppellee Richard Jimenez was injured when a disk sander that he had purchased at a Sears store shattered.
Sears raises three issues on appeal: (1) the trial court erred in refusing to give a comparative fault instruction; (2) a new trial should have been ordered because of juror misconduct; and, (3) the trial court should have admitted evidence of the safety history of the sander. We conclude that a comparative fault instruction should have been given and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dart v. Wiebe Manufacturing, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Jones v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Boy v. I.T.T. Grinnell Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Gibbs v. O'Malley Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995