Baker v. Harmon

WILESON, O. J.

(after stating the facts as above). We do not think a sufficient reason why the judgment should be reversed is stated in any of the assignments in appellant’s brief.

So far as the findings of negligence on the part of appellant in ways submitted to them are concerned, they were amply supported by the testimony, and we think the jury had a right to say, as they did, that the deceased was not guilty of contributory negligence which was a proximate cause of the accident.

The contentions based on the action of the trial court in permitting the widow of the deceased to testify oyer…