Donmi of Milford, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
INTERIM RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
EGINTON, District Judge.
This dispute arises from the award by the Waterbury Public Housing Authority (“PHA”) of a contract for a federal housing project. The defendants have moved to dismiss this action, arguing that the plaintiff is without standing, that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, and that the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motions must be denied.
Factual Background1
On February 17, 1982, the PHA solicited proposals for the construction of 21 units of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.