Legal Opinion
Bredy v. Cantrell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 3, 1951No. 34211PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is an action by Dona L. Cantrell against Fred W. Bredy and Nora Lee Bredy to recover balance due on money advanced by her for the purchase of lots 12 and 13 in Neas' Addition to Oklahoma City and the establishment and foreclosure of an equitable lien against the lots.
The evidence is undisputed that on or about June 1, 1946, plaintiff advanced defendants the sum of $1,750 as the down payment for the purchase price of the lots in question; that defendants repaid plaintiff on such advance the sum of $681, and there is a balance due in the sum of $1,069 which defendants refused to pay.
Plainti…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gabbard v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Mullens v. Geo. C. Wright Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Baker v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Deskins v. Fidelity Nat. Bank of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Holden v. ButlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- P.D. Casper v. Glen M. Neubert, of the Estate of Gerald L. Reasor, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Floyd v. DodsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- Bolding v. ClantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Loveless v. HollowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Wigley v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.