Floyd v. Dodson
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
STUBBLEFIELD, Judge.
In this action for foreclosure of a “joint venturer’s lien” and damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the defendant appeals the jury’s verdict and award of damages in favor of the plaintiff on both causes of action. The plaintiff cross-appeals for attorney fees on her first cause of action. After reviewing the record and applicable law, we affirm the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff on her first cause of action but reverse and remand the matter for new trial on plaintiff’s second cause of action. We find that plaintiff was entitled to recover…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Breeden v. League Services Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Munley v. ISC Financial House, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Williams v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Sopkin v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Bennett v. City National Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ali DAEMI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHURCH’S FRIED CHICKEN, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Marshall v. Nelson ElectricDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1991
- Sigma Resources Corp. v. Norse Exploration, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- IN RE AMENDMENTS TO THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS - CIVILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- IN RE AMENDMENTS TO THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS - CIVILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.