People v. Wright
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by certain remarks made by the prosecutor during summation is unpreserved for appellate review as he did not object to the remarks at issue (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Medina, 53 NY2d 951, 953 [1981]; People v Clemente, 84 AD3d 829, 830-831 [2011] ; People v Charles, 57 AD3d 556, 556 [2008]; People v Gill, 54 AD3d 965, 966 [2008]). In any event, the challenged remarks were fair comment on the evidence, permissible rhetorical comment, or responsive to defense counsel’s summation (see People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105, 109-110 [1976]).
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. MedinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. MorencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.