Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Littlehales

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 2007PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

LALLY-GREEN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Paul Robert Littlehales, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on April 6, 2006. We vacate and remand.

¶ 2 The procedural history of the case is as follows. On April 5, 2006, Appellant pled nolo contendere to four counts of theft by deception and two counts of conspiracy to commit theft by deception. The charges arose from allegations that Appellant took money from elderly people under false pretenses.1 On April 6, 2006, the trial court imposed an aggregate prison term of one to two years pursuant to the “discretionary mandatory minimum”…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. FullinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. ShifflerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. MartsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. RoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NischanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. CookSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. FeuchtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. FosterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. FosterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API