Legal Opinion
Adams v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 18, 1988No. 86 Civ. 753 (RLC)PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
The Government brings this motion, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 3(j), to reargue portions of the court’s decision of November 18, 1987. The facts of the case are fully stated in the court’s earlier opinion, familiarity with which is assumed. See Adams v. United States, 673 F.Supp. 1249 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (Carter, J.).
The only proper ground on which a party may move to reargue an unambiguous order is that the court has overlooked “matters or controlling decisions” which, had they been considered, might reasonably have altered the result reached by the court.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. TrainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Caleb & Co. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Schonberger v. SerchukDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Morser v. AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMSDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Providence Journal Company and Gerald M. Carbone v. United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Morse/Diesel, Inc. v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of MarylandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.