Legal Opinion
Miner v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 10, 1977No. 2 CA-CIV 2253PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs/appellees and defendants/appellants were partners in the purchase and operation of a motel. In November of 1973 the partnership was dissolved and the parties signed a dissolution agreement. The agreement gave Miner the option to either buy or sell his interest in the partnership and if he elected to buy, he had until January 1, 1974 to get a written commitment of financing. In the event that he could not do so, then either Rogers or Miner had the privilege of buying by being the first to obtain financing and releasing the other party.
In the interim…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright v. LakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Catron v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Petition of StatterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- Henry Hanger & Display Fixture Corporation of America v. Sel-O-Rak Corporation, Sel-O-Rak Corporation v. Henry Hanger & Display Fixture Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Hewins v. WeilerArizona Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clark v. EdrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Seguin v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Tankersley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984