Legal Opinion

United States v. Russell "Rusty" Prevatte and Robert A. Soy

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 14, 1995No. 94-3360, 94-3361Published

1Opinion of the Court

66 F.3d 840

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Russell "Rusty" PREVATTE and Robert A. Soy, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 94-3360, 94-3361.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued May 31, 1995.

Decided Sept. 14, 1995.

Andrew B. Baker, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Office of the United States Attorney, Dyer, IN and Donald J. Schmid (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, South Bend, IN, for plaintiff-appellee.

Alexander M. Salerno (argued), Berwyn, IL and Robert A. Stevenson (argued), Palos Park, IL, for defendants-appellants.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, RIPPLE, Circuit Judge,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Posner; Concurrence · Norgle.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,379 Marian W. Short v. Belleville Shoe Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Marius CanoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Gregory Lee Martin, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API