State v. Norman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We remand to the trial court for further hearing and determination whether each defendant had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the premises searched so as to afford him or her standing under the doctrine stated in United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83, 100 S.Ct. 2547, 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980). There is no longer automatic standing as in Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960). See Coster v. State, 392 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). See also Combs v. United States, 408 U.S. 224, 92 S.Ct. 2284, 33 L.Ed.2d 308 (1972). It will be remembered that pursuant to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Combs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dean v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Coster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- State v. PhillipsCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990