Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Goldenstein

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1984No. 3-83-0249PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

The plaintiff underwent a hysterectomy performed by the defendants. Following surgery, there were complications which resulted in the loss of the plaintiff’s left kidney. The plaintiff brought a malpractice action alleging that the defendants had damaged her left ureter during surgery, which caused kidney damage. The plaintiff also alleged that the defendants were negligent in failing to recognize the nature of the post-operative complications soon enough so as to prevent kidney damage and in failing to inform her of the nature and severity of the complications.

At the close of the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Needy v. SparksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Spidle v. StewardIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Martin v. BrennanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dyback v. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Dyback v. WeberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Curtis v. WolfeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Soderquist v. St. Charles Mall Associates, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Curtis v. GoldensteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API