Legal Opinion

State of Maine v. John M. Burbank

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 7, 2019No. Docket: Lin-18-61PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Concurrence: ALEXANDER, J.

HJELM, J.

*853[¶1] John M. Burbank appeals from a judgment convicting him of operating under the influence (Class D), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(A) (2018), and operating beyond a license condition or restriction (Class E), 29-A M.R.S. § 1251(1)(B) (2018), issued by the trial court (Lincoln County, Billings, J. ) after Burbank entered a conditional plea of nolo contendere to each charge, see M.R.U. Crim. P. 11(a)(2). Burbank contends that the trial court erred by excluding testimony of two witnesses whom Burbank had designated-seriatim-as experts to testify that at the time…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. State of Maine v. Arnold A. DianaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  5. State v. EricsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Reginald J. Dobbins Jr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  2. State of Maine v. John D. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  3. Mark Cardilli Jr. v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
  4. State of Maine v. Christopher MurraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
  5. State of Maine v. Christopher MurraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API