Legal Opinion

In Re Wharry

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 31, 1988No. 19-30357PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DISALLOWING PROOF OF CLAIM

WALTER J. KRASNIEWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter is before the court upon objections of Debtors, Defiance Landmark, Inc. and the trustee to the proofs of claim filed by the Toledo Trust Company. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that said objections are well taken and should be sustained and that Toledo Trust may not share as an unsecured creditor under Debtors’ chapter 12 plan.

FACTS

On May 26, 1987, Debtors filed' their voluntary petition under chapter 12 of title 11. Debtors listed the Toledo Trust Corp., now Trustcorp., Bank, Ohio…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anaheim Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Evans (In Re Evans)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Street v. Lawson (In Re Street)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. In Re J. David Dominelli, Debtors. M. Larry Lawrence v. Steinford Holding B v. a Netherlands CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. In Re ChirilloUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  5. In Re WiltUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re GlowUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
  2. Thomas Irving Jones v. Sally ArrossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. In Re NohleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1988
  4. In Re HarperUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
  5. In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API