Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Golden City Park Corp. v. Board of Standards and Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 1941Published

1ConcurrenceHagarty, J.

While I concur in the result, my opinion is that the order should not be reversed on the ground that a vested right was not acquired by the petitioner prior to the zoning amendment. A permit was issued to the petitioner on October 14, 1938. The planning commission did not adopt its resolution to amend the zone, changing it from business to residence use, until October 26, 1938. The board of estimate, by affirmative action, approved the change on November 17, 1938. In Matter of Fox Lane Corporation v. Mann (216 App. Div. 813; affd., 243 N. Y. 550) the improvement prior to the change of zone…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Ortenberg v. BalesNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. People ex rel. Ortenberg v. BalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Matter of Fox Lane CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Fox Lane Corp. v. MannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  5. Tralow Realty Corp. v. MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API