Legal Opinion
Ashlan Park Center LLC v. Crow
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 2, 2015No. F069221PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, J.
— Appellant appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court sustained respondent’s demurrer to appellant’s amended petition for writ of mandate without leave to amend. We find no error and affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Petitioner filed an amended petition for writ of mandate, alleging it is the owner of a shopping center purchased in March of 2013. It purchased the property from five limited liability companies that owned the property as tenants in common (TICs). The prior owners purchased the property in 2006; in 2008, the nation’s financial market collapsed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hernandez v. City of PomonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Lee v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- First American Commercial Real Estate Services Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People Ex Rel. Strumpfer v. Westoaks Investment 27California Court of Appeal · 2006
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Small Prop. Owners of S.F. Inst. v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Dilbert v. NewsomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Small Property Owners, etc. v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018