Legal Opinion

General Excavator Co. v. Keystone Driller Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1932No. 6065-6068PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLO ÓPER, Circuit Judge.

The above-numbered appeals and cross-appeals are founded upon two almost identical actions commenced in the District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, respectively against the General Excavator Company and the OiSgood Company, and alleging infringement of five separate patents owned by the Keystone Driller Company, one of which was patent to Robert Rex Downie, No. 1.511.114, granted October 7,1924, which was held valid by this court November 5, 1930. Byers Mach. Co. v. Keystone Driller Co. (C. C. A.) 44 F.(2d) 283.

The bills of complaint in the present…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Deweese v. ReinhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. MacRae v. MacRaeArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bentley v. TibbalsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Overman Cushion Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  2. A. B. Dick Co. v. MarrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  3. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Aptix Corp. v. Quickturn Design Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. W. E. Plechaty Co. v. Heckett Engineering, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API