Insurance Company of North America v. Ruppert
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellee brought suit on an insurance contract written by appellant, and recovered judgment. A provision of the contract insured appellee against the theft of her personal property. No argument is made concerning the application of the policy assuming a loss by theft was established. The question is did appellee prove that her property was lost in that manner. The trial court found that she did and that finding is the basic error assigned. In brief, appellant maintains that the evidence does not permit an inference of theft. Although appellant has ably presented its…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Levin v. GreenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- United Insurance Company v. NicholsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- District of Columbia v. VignauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rich v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Simpson v. Logan Motor CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Austin v. American Casualty CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963