Legal Opinion

Ayers v. Amatucci

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 31, 1949No. 33596PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendants in error, defendants below, for damages for personal injuries.

Defendants demurred to plaintiff’s petition and the same was overruled by the court, and thereafter issues Were joined, and the case came on for trial.

After a jury had been empaneled, counsel for the plaintiff stated his case to the jury, the facts he expected to prove and adopted all of the allegations of plaintiff’s petition as a part of his opening statement, at the close of which defendants moved the court for judgment upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McLaughlin v. LagersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Novak v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Harrell v. HortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Ayers v. AmatucciSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Utley v. Standard Magnesium & Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. Novak v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API