Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re: Sealed Case

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 19, 1997No. 97-3025Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRandolph, Circuit Judge

I concur in the majority’s opinion insofar as it upholds the district court’s “transfer” of the defendant for prosecution as an adult. The balance of the opinion deals with the appeal from the district court’s order regarding the United States Attorney’s certification of a “substantial Federal interest,” 18 U.S.C. § 5032. I cannot join this part because, in my view, we do not have appellate jurisdiction to decide the matter: the order is not a final decision; it does not fall within the collateral order doctrine; we do not have pendent jurisdiction over it; and certification is not a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API