Legal Opinion
In re Anderson
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided January 24, 2012No. C09-1436RSLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1266ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND CONTINUING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Limitation Plaintiff James T. Anderson’s Motion for Limitation and Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 19). Pursuant to the Limitation of Liability Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30505, Plaintiff asks the Court to conclude that he is entitled to limit his liability for any action arising from the loss of his vessel, the CATSHOT, and its crew to the CATSHOT’s value at the end of the voyage. He also asks the Court to dismiss the Jones Act and common law wrongful…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- American Title Insurance Company v. Lacelaw CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hassanati v. International Lease Finance Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Grace v. Olympia School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021