Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Santos

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 1, 2003No. 02-P-206PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaurence, J.

After a bench trial on the charge of criminal trespass (G. L. c. 266, § 120) in Franklin District Court, the defendant, Joanne Santos, was convicted of “trespass by agency.”1 She contends that the trial judge erred (1) in finding that the mechanical hoisting of cement blocks above, but never *702touching, her neighbors’ driveway (which bisected her property) constituted a criminal trespass; and (2) in finding her guilty of trespass by reason of the actions taken by the crane operator whom she had hired to move the cement blocks. Finding no basis upon which the defendant’s conviction may stand, we…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. WelanskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Beneficial Finance Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DiJohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  2. Welch Foods, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API