Legal Opinion
Mifflinburg Bank v. Bickhart
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1923No. Docket No. 96PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
The trial judge granted, unconditionally, defendants’ motion for a new trial. Plaintiff seeks review on writ of error.
The unconditional granting of a motion for a new trial may not be reviewed on writ of error. See Decker v. Fair, 222 Mich. 507; Carton v. Day, 157 Mich. 43; 3 Comp. Laws 1915, §§ 13736, 12635, and cases cited in the annotations.
The writ is dismissed, with costs to defendants.
Wiest, C. J., and Fellows, McDonald, Bird, Sharpe, Moore, and Steere, JJ., concurred.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Decker v. FairMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Carton v. DayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benmark v. SteffenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Wheeler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Terzian v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Terzian v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924