Legal Opinion

Hill v. Zoning Hearing Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1993No. Nos. 58 and 59 M.D. Appeal Docket 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

The present appeal and cross-appeal are taken, by allowance, from an order of the Commonwealth Court which affirmed in part and reversed in part an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County which affirmed a decision of the Zoning Hearing Board of Chestnuthill Township (Board), 144 Pa.Cmwlth. 644, 601 A.2d 1362. The Board’s decision granted West End Mining and Processing Co., Inc. (WEMPCO) a certificate of non-conforming use.

At issue is whether land uses initiated by WEMPCO before the adoption of a zoning ordinance in Chestnuthill Township can be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Casey v. ZONING HEAR. BD. OF WARWICK TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Boron Oil Co. v. KimpleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Honey Brook Township v. AlenovitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Hill v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Armstead v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API