Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Great American Cash Advance, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 29, 2007No. A07A0781PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

In this action involving a “payday” loan contract, Demetris Crawford appeals from the trial court’s grant of Great American Cash Advance, Inc.’s (GACA) motion to compel arbitration of her counterclaim, arguing that the trial court erred in (1) finding that the arbitration clause was enforceable, (2) finding that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) governed this matter, and (3) compelling arbitration of an unconscionable contract. Crawford also argues (4) that the doctrine of res judicata precludes arbitration of this matter. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

“…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Parada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Order Homes, LLC v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Helms v. Franklin Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Yates v. CACV OF COLORADO, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. In Re: Checking Account Overdraft Litigation MDL No 2036 Lawrence D. Hough v. Regions Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API