Numer v. Kansas City
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DEW, Special Commissioner.
Respondents brought this action for a judgment declaring null and void Ordinance No. 25574, passed by the council of appellant Kansas City, Missouri, by the terms of which a certain tract of real estate belonging to appellants Sam and Louise Eddy would be reclassified under the basic zoning ordinance of Kansas City from “R-5, High Apartments” to “C-2, Local Retail Business”; to enjoin such owners from making any use of such property other than prescribed for its present classification R-5, and to enjoin appellant City and its agencies from granting any permit to do…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. City of North Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Taylor v. SchlemmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Downing v. City of JoplinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Strandberg v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Treme v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Desloge v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Smith v. City of Lee's SummitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Clarkson Valley Estates, Inc. v. Village of Clarkson ValleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.