Legal Opinion
Ware v. Barfield
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 9, 1932No. 3904PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
On December 7,1931, the will of Mrs. M. D. Oliver-Eakle, a feme sole, was admitted to probate by the county court of Potter County. In this will R. C. Ware, Wm. C. Perry, Homer A. Callaway, and B. I. Barfield were named as independent executors. Bequests were made to various persons, amounting in value to more than $100,000. The remainder of her estate was placed in trust with the executors above mentioned for her daughter and only child, the appellee herein. Of the bequests named in the will, the following property was devised to the executors: lots of the aggregate value of $50,000 to B. I.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McArthur v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Roy v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Rowe v. DyessTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1902
- Smith v. HaireTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mosells Silvey Pitner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Hutcherson v. HutchersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Alice National Bank v. Corpus Christi Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- King v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Higginbotham v. Alexander Trust EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.